- Written by Deeksha Srivastava
- Posted on June 17, 2019
- Updated on June 20, 2019
- 11852 Views
This feature allows a user to configure Autonomous System Number (ASN) in Asdot notation and get the ASN in output of
- Written by Jonathan Kehler
- Posted on April 15, 2020
- Updated on April 15, 2020
- 10529 Views
Adds the ability to revert to previous behavior where BGP and static routes could resolve over BGP aggregates (when
- Written by Trevor Mendez
- Posted on March 31, 2017
- Updated on March 31, 2017
- 15848 Views
This feature is provided on all platforms. The BGP listen range command has been modified to optionally allow
- Written by Joanne Mikkelson
- Posted on March 8, 2024
- Updated on March 8, 2024
- 6311 Views
Prior to this feature, when the multi-agent routing protocol model was in use, the BGP agents (Bgp and, starting with 4.22.1F, BgpCliHelper) were always running, even if BGP was not configured. With this feature, these two BGP agents do not start up until BGP configuration is created with “router bgp <asn>”.
- Written by Ankush Sharma
- Posted on February 8, 2017
- Updated on February 9, 2017
- 10164 Views
The "set as path prepend" clause in route map configuration mode has been enhanced with the addition of the “last
- Written by Srinivasan Koona Lokabiraman
- Posted on June 3, 2020
- Updated on June 3, 2020
- 12222 Views
It is often useful to know on a per AFI/SAFI basis, the number of paths that have been selected from a peer as best paths.
- Written by Trevor Mendez
- Posted on December 20, 2021
- Updated on January 12, 2026
- 13444 Views
ACL based traffic management often requires matching packets’ destination addresses against one or more sets of IP prefixes. This can become difficult to manage when the prefix sets need to be consistently maintained on several devices and either change too frequently or are very large. When the prefixes for the prefix sets are learned by BGP, this feature provides an alternative to maintaining unwieldy sets of statically configured IP prefixes. Instead the prefix sets are populated by BGP based on the BGP communities that are assigned to learned prefixes. BGP can manage IP prefix field sets for use with Traffic Policies.
- Written by Francesco Belletti
- Posted on August 20, 2020
- Updated on August 20, 2020
- 11515 Views
This feature adds support for “Enhanced Route Refresh” capability (RFC7313). An enhanced route refresh is,
- Written by Pauric Ward
- Posted on August 23, 2022
- Updated on September 12, 2022
- 9564 Views
Stale routes are learned routes from adjacent BGP neighbors whose neighborship has been interrupted by session instability. This feature adds a mechanism to specify a stale policy route-map for which the stale routes from a gracefully restarting, or depending on the configuration of the feature, a non-gracefully restarting BGP peer will be processed.
- Written by Andrew Li
- Posted on August 31, 2023
- Updated on April 10, 2024
- 9281 Views
This feature enables Flowspec rules to be leaked from one VRF to another. When combined with the ability to apply Flowspec rules from one VRF to interfaces in another VRF, this feature makes it possible to combine rules from different source VRFs into a target VRF, and apply the target VRF’s rules on the interfaces of the source VRFs.
- Written by Vipul Shah
- Posted on March 13, 2020
- Updated on May 4, 2022
- 13133 Views
The goal of IAR operation is to minimize the CPU processing and churn in hardware by identifying a set of nexthop adjacencies such that updating those adjacencies in-place is sufficient to correctly forward the traffic quickly for all the affected routes.
- Written by Yoshihiro Ishijima
- Posted on September 12, 2024
- Updated on September 12, 2024
- 4574 Views
BGP inbound update processing delay is a feature in EOS where an optional delay is applied prior to processing inbound UPDATE messages from a peer(s). The duration of the delay is configurable per peer. The delay is applied to UPDATE messages for all the address families that are negotiated with the peer. The delay timer starts when the peer becomes established. The routes from such peers are processed only after the timer expires. Any routes received after the timer expired are processed as usual without the delay. Both the default VRF and non-default VRFs are supported.
- Written by Yoshihiro Ishijima
- Posted on February 25, 2022
- Updated on June 12, 2023
- 10617 Views
This feature adds support for sending and receiving BGP IPv6 labeled-unicast routes with IPv4-mapped IPv6 next hops. With this feature enabled, when a BGP speaker receives a next hop with IPv4-mapped IPv6 address,
- Written by Prashanth Rajendran
- Posted on November 14, 2019
- Updated on November 15, 2019
- 11911 Views
This feature adds support for BGP peering over IPv6 link local addresses. This feature is available with the with the
- Written by Nandan Saha
- Posted on August 24, 2020
- Updated on January 8, 2025
- 16173 Views
The BGP-LS extension allows IGPs (OSPF/IS-IS) link state database information to be injected into BGP. This is typically used in deployments where some external component, (like a controller or Path Computation Engine) can do centralized path computations by learning the entire IGP topology through BGP-LS. The controller can then communicate the computed paths based on the BGP-LS updates to the head end device in the network. The mechanism used by the controller to communicate the computed TE paths is outside the scope of this document. Using BGP-LS instead of an IGP peering with the controller to distribute IGP link state information has the following advantages.
- Written by Quentin L'Hours
- Posted on December 23, 2019
- Updated on December 23, 2019
- 12368 Views
In the multi agent routing protocol model, the Bgp agent now supports matching community lists with a logical OR via
- Written by Srinivasan Koona Lokabiraman
- Posted on February 17, 2021
- Updated on June 21, 2022
- 11367 Views
The BGP graceful restart mechanism has a limitation that the graceful restart time cannot exceed 4095 seconds per the
- Written by Qianchen Zhao
- Posted on December 20, 2019
- Updated on March 7, 2024
- 14089 Views
BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) allows a monitoring station to connect to a router and collect all of the BGP announcements received from the router’s BGP peers. The announcements are sent to the station in the form of BMP Route Monitoring messages generated from path information in the router’s BGP Adj-Rib-In tables.
- Written by Qin Zhang
- Posted on May 21, 2019
- Updated on September 5, 2019
- 12932 Views
BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) allows a monitoring station to connect to a router and collect all of the BGP
- Written by Yaonan Liang
- Posted on December 24, 2024
- Updated on December 18, 2025
- 4476 Views
BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) allows a monitoring station to connect to a router and collect all of the BGP announcements received from the router’s BGP peers. The announcements are sent to the station in the form of BMP Route Monitoring messages generated from path information in the router’s BGP internal tables. A BMP speaker may choose to send either Adj-Rib-In routes, or Loc-Rib routes (as defined by RFC9069 ), or both.
- Written by Paulo Panhoto
- Posted on September 3, 2021
- Updated on September 3, 2021
- 11613 Views
The route reflector, as described in RFC 4456, is a router allowed to advertise (reflect) iBGP learned routes to other
- Written by Dongliang Feng
- Posted on October 17, 2024
- Updated on October 17, 2024
- 4265 Views
When a core router has competing advertisements for the same prefix from various PEs, the local edge route should be selected as the best path based on the IGP metric of the resolving routes of those competing advertisements. Without the support mentioned in this TOI, when a BGP route has two or more levels of recursion, the BGP process does not utilize the IGP distance in the route selection process.
- Written by Sandeep Betha
- Posted on January 22, 2021
- Updated on March 7, 2025
- 16258 Views
This feature adds support for user-configured BGP Nexthop Resolution RIB profiles for various BGP-based services e.g. IP unicast, L3 VPN, EVPN, etc. The feature allows an administrator to customize the next hop resolution semantics of BGP routes with an ordered list, or profile, of resolution RIB domains (i.e., either tunnel or IP domain). This allows EOS to direct specific services over the specified RIB domains, overriding the default behavior.
- Written by Manoj Agiwal
- Posted on September 30, 2015
- Updated on July 12, 2024
- 22907 Views
BGP Non Stop Forwarding (NSF) aims to minimize the traffic loss when the the following scenarios occur:
- Written by Jesper Skriver
- Posted on April 25, 2022
- Updated on July 10, 2024
- 11573 Views
Route reflectors are commonly used to distribute routes between BGP peers belonging to the same autonomous system. However, this can lead to non-optimal path selection. The reason for this is that the route reflector chooses the optimal route based on IGP cost from its perspective. This may not be optimal from the perspective of the client as its location may be different from the RR
- Written by Srinivasan Koona Lokabiraman
- Posted on August 25, 2020
- Updated on August 25, 2020
- 12095 Views
The BGP graceful restart mechanism has a limitation that the graceful restart time cannot exceed 4095 seconds as per
- Written by Peter Friend
- Posted on March 3, 2023
- Updated on January 6, 2026
- 9072 Views
Creating Traffic Policies that regulate control plane traffic from BGP peers by writing the list of BGP peer addresses statically in a field-set is error prone and difficult to update. Selecting only internal or external peers requires additional care. This feature automatically populates a field-set with IPv4 or IPv6 prefixes corresponding to iBGP or eBGP peers. This can be used instead of “protocol neighbors bgp” (see "Support for CPU traffic policy" ) where only a particular peer type is needed, or to replace complicated manual field-set updates.
- Written by Yaonan Liang
- Posted on April 30, 2025
- Updated on September 12, 2025
- 3296 Views
Peer Tagging Route Filtering feature discards BGP route advertisements by the peers which the routes are received from. The feature lets users assign a peer-tag to a peer or a group of peers in inbound direction and discard routes advertisements by the peer-tag in outbound direction. One use case of the feature is to discard AS loop routes in outbound direction in data center deployments.
- Written by Yaonan Liang
- Posted on October 11, 2019
- Updated on October 11, 2019
- 11569 Views
BGP update wait for convergence feature prevents BGP from programming routes into hardware and advertising routes
- Written by Navneet Sinha
- Posted on June 29, 2016
- Updated on June 29, 2016
- 11122 Views
The sub route map configuration simplifies routing policies by sharing common policy across route maps. Common
- Written by Andrew Li
- Posted on January 23, 2019
- Updated on July 22, 2025
- 11679 Views
The BGP Prefix Independent Convergence (PIC) Edge feature refers to fast re-convergence of traffic destined for BGP prefixes on a network event affecting the best path(s) such that the time taken to switch traffic from the active best path(s) to the next best path (i.e. backup path) is independent of the number of prefixes. The above behavior is achieved by pre-programming the best path and alternate backup path in the forwarding agent in steady state.
- Written by Jason Shamberger
- Posted on April 20, 2020
- Updated on March 10, 2025
- 15484 Views
RPKI provides a mechanism to validate the originating AS of an advertised prefix. Using the result of the validation to apply inbound policy in a route map.
- Written by Zhuang Liu
- Posted on June 25, 2021
- Updated on June 25, 2021
- 10179 Views
Remove Private AS Ingress is a feature used for removing and replacing private AS numbers from inbound AS paths, so
- Written by Lakshmi Yarramaneni
- Posted on June 13, 2019
- Updated on June 20, 2019
- 10769 Views
The replace remote AS feature allows a provider edge (PE) router to change the autonomous system (AS) number used by a
- Written by Charles Gibert
- Posted on June 13, 2019
- Updated on June 13, 2019
- 10886 Views
The “set as path prepend” clause in route map configuration mode has been enhanced with the addition of
- Written by Prashanth Rajendran
- Posted on March 16, 2021
- Updated on March 16, 2021
- 10504 Views
This feature adds support for BGP peering with multiple peers using the same IP address. The router id of those peers is
- Written by Joel Katticaran
- Posted on April 15, 2020
- Updated on April 16, 2020
- 17069 Views
This change adds a global toggle to BGP communities that allow for community sharing to be enabled/disabled for all
- Written by Feng Zhu
- Posted on January 3, 2023
- Updated on January 11, 2023
- 9180 Views
This feature monitors the BGP session status. When a BGP session goes down, traffic originally forwarded to the next hops learned from the downed BGP peer is quickly diverted to a backup path if any, or in the case of ECMP, remaining ECMP members.
- Written by Dongliang Feng
- Posted on June 20, 2022
- Updated on March 19, 2025
- 13686 Views
When a Provider Edge (PE) device loses BGP connectivity to the core (uplink) devices, it may be unable to forward any traffic from its downlink devices, typically CE (Customer Edge) devices. It is beneficial to indicate this connectivity loss to these CE devices so that they may find alternative paths to forward traffic.
- Written by Vishrant Vasavada
- Posted on November 12, 2019
- Updated on November 12, 2019
- 10825 Views
This feature implements support for RFC8203/BIS so that users can attach the reason of BGP instance or peer session
- Written by Vu Nguyen
- Posted on August 23, 2022
- Updated on November 22, 2023
- 11683 Views
EOS currently supports BGP message authentication via the TCP MD5 Signature (TCP MD5) option (RFC 2385) to protect the BGP sessions from spoofed TCP segments. However, research has shown many concerns that the TCP MD5 algorithm is cryptographically ineffective with a just simple keyed hash for authentication.
- Written by Trevor Mendez
- Posted on July 2, 2025
- Updated on July 2, 2025
- 1854 Views
BGP triggered IP-in-GUE Encapsulation provides a mechanism for dynamically creating tunnels in a core network using an IP underlay. IP-in-GUE (Generic UDP Encapsulation) encapsulates IP traffic in an IPv4/UDP header. IP unicast routes to destinations reachable across the core network are learned via BGP at the ingress edge.
- Written by Keon Vafai
- Posted on June 22, 2020
- Updated on November 5, 2025
- 20916 Views
This feature adds support for BGP UCMP in the multi agent routing protocol model. The TOI for BGP UCMP in the ribd
- Written by Pintu Kumar
- Posted on June 17, 2019
- Updated on June 19, 2019
- 16931 Views
This feature extends the BGP Layer 3 VPN Import/Export and VRF Route Leaking functionality to “default” VRF.
- Written by Forhad Ahmed
- Posted on June 5, 2023
- Updated on June 7, 2023
- 8293 Views
BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) allows a monitoring station to connect to a router and collect all of the BGP announcements received from the router’s BGP peers. The announcements are sent to the station in the form of BMP Route Monitoring messages generated from path information in the router’s BGP Adj-Rib-In tables. A BMP speaker may choose to send either pre-policy routes, post-policy routes, or both.
- Written by Forhad Ahmed
- Posted on April 19, 2022
- Updated on March 7, 2023
- 10535 Views
BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) allows a monitoring station to connect to a router and collect all of the BGP announcements received from the router’s BGP peers.
- Written by Imtiyaz Mohammad
- Posted on June 17, 2025
- Updated on January 8, 2026
- 2162 Views
Class based forwarding (CBF) is a means for steering network traffic into colored tunnels based on one or more fields of the ingress traffic. Rephrased, CBF is forwarding of traffic based on “classes” which are derived from fields in the ingress packet headers and policies provisioned on the router.
- Written by Trevor Mendez
- Posted on April 17, 2020
- Updated on January 8, 2026
- 11185 Views
Segment Routing Traffic Engineering Policy (SR-TE) aka SR Policy makes use of Segment Routing (SR) to allow a headend to steer traffic along any path without maintaining per flow state in every node. A headend steers traffic into an “SR Policy”. Class Based Forwarding (CBF) for SR-TE is a means for steering IP traffic into an SR Policy based on the ingress DSCP values. This mechanism is described in the section on Per-Flow Steering in the Segment Routing Policy Architecture Internet draft.
- Written by Bharath Somayaji
- Posted on April 25, 2022
- Updated on January 8, 2026
- 13385 Views
Class Based Forwarding (CBF) is a means for steering IP traffic into colored tunnels based on the ingress DSCP values. CBF may be used with SR-TE Policy, RSVP-TE or Flex-Algo colored tunnels.
- Written by Navneet Sinha
- Posted on June 29, 2016
- Updated on February 5, 2022
- 10322 Views
This feature provides the ability to track the reason why a BGP path is excluded from the BGP best path selection
